Environmental factors do not explain the increase in the prevalence of autism

0

Disclosures: One study author reports grants from the Swedish Research Council during the conduct of the study, and another study author reports grants and personal costs from Shire / Takeda and personal costs from Evolan in outside of the submitted work. The other authors do not report any relevant financial information.


We have not been able to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to experience this problem, please contact [email protected]

Environmental factors related to autism spectrum disorders have not increased in importance over time and are therefore unlikely to explain the increased prevalence of ASDs, according to the results of a twin design study published in JAMA Psychiatry.

“The twin methods provide a tool for testing [the environmental] hypothesis because they can compare the magnitude of genetic and environmental contributions with a trait on different groups, such as individuals born at different time periods ”, Mark J. Taylor, PhD, from the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics at the Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, and colleagues wrote. “If changes in the environment over time explain the changing prevalence of a trait, then one hypothesis is that environmental variance should increase over time. If the underlying genetic variance showed little or no change, then the heritability of a given trait is expected to decrease as well.

Taylor and his colleagues set out to assess whether this hypothesis is true for ASDs by studying whether the relative importance of environmental and genetic associations with ASDs and autistic traits changed over a period of 16 and 26 years.

Researchers analyzed data from two cohorts of Swedish twins nationwide – the Swedish Twin Registry (STR), which included participants born between January 1982 and December 2008, and the Child and Adolescent Twin Study in Sweden ( CATSS), which included participants born between January 1992 and December 2008. They identified ASD diagnoses for twins in the STR, with follow-up to 2013, and used questionnaires to assign screening diagnoses for ASD to CATSS participants and to assess autistic traits.

Data reference: Taylor MJ, et al. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020; doi: 10.1001 / jamapsychiatrie.200.0680.

Taylor and colleagues divided each sample into multiple birth cohorts spanning 1982 to 1991 for the STR only, as well as 1992 to 1995, 1996 to 1999, 2000 to 2003, and 2004 to 2008. They assessed whether any changes occurred in the STR. birth cohorts in environmental and genetic domains. the variance underlying autistic traits, as well as the relative contribution of genetics and environment to the responsibility for autism.

The analysis included data from 22,678 pairs of twins in the STR and 15,280 pairs in the CATSS. The results showed that the heritability of screening diagnoses ranged from 0.75 (95% CI, 0.58-0.87) to 0.93 (95% CI, 0.84 to 0.98) among CATSS participants and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.74 to 0.96) to 0.97 (95% CI, 0.89-0.99) among STR participants. The researchers observed a modest increase in the variance of autistic traits over time, associated with increases in environmental and genetic variance, with the total variance increasing from 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0, 98) to 1.17 (95% CI, 1.13-1.21). ) over time.

“Our results do not dismiss the role of environmental factors in ASD and are consistent with previous studies suggesting that these factors are likely to be unshared rather than shared,” the researchers wrote. “Unrequited environmental factors contribute to differences between parents sharing the same household (eg, birth weight in association with ASD).” – by Joe Gramigna

Disclosures: One study author reports grants from the Swedish Research Council during the conduct of the study, and another study author reports grants and personal costs from Shire / Takeda and personal costs from Evolan in outside of the submitted work. The other authors do not report any relevant financial information.


Source link

Share.

Leave A Reply